Is there a divide in the world of arbitration between arbitrators appointed from the trade and arbitrators appointed from the law?

There is a contract. It is there in print. But a difference emerges between Seller + Buyer about the meaning of a sentence. Lawyer arbitrators say words are words — they have meaning — stick to the words. Trade arbitrators say there is an overall commercial context and see the words with a different meaning.

The parties have chosen arbitration in preference to litigation. The arbitrators from the business sector have their own commercial understanding. They have seen it all before + reach one conclusion. The arbitrators from the law have their own legal understanding + see things quite differently. Who Is Right? Who Is Wrong?

The Law — Lord Hamblen — says words have specific legal meaning — stick to them. But is that why the Seller and Buyer chose arbitration in preference to litigation. Doesn’t the trade want a commercial experience? An interesting division of opinions opens up. Trade arbitrators and Lawyer arbitrators have different views.

Hastags! #supremecourt #tradeassociations, #Arbitration #ThoughtForTheDay Visit My Blog


Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store