Is there a divide in the world of arbitration between arbitrators appointed from the trade and arbitrators appointed from the law?

There is a contract. It is there in print. But a difference emerges between Seller + Buyer about the meaning of a sentence. Lawyer arbitrators say words are words — they have meaning — stick to the words. Trade arbitrators say there is an overall commercial context and see the words with a different meaning.

The parties have chosen arbitration in preference to litigation. The arbitrators from the business sector have their own commercial understanding. They have seen it all before + reach one conclusion. The arbitrators from the law have their own legal understanding + see things quite differently. Who Is Right? Who Is Wrong?

The Law — Lord Hamblen — says words have specific legal meaning — stick to them. But is that why the Seller and Buyer chose arbitration in preference to litigation. Doesn’t the trade want a commercial experience? An interesting division of opinions opens up. Trade arbitrators and Lawyer arbitrators have different views.

Hastags! #supremecourt #tradeassociations, #Arbitration #ThoughtForTheDay Visit My Blog


Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Graham Perry

Graham Perry

My understanding of China is dethatched, objective and informed unlike most other commentators who political prejudices invade their writings.